Legal Opinion

Smithers v. Hagerman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1990No. 89-371PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

In a boundary dispute, the District Court for the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County, ruled in favor of plaintiffs, ordered that defendants remove their encroachments on plaintiffs’ land and awarded damages in the amount of $7,159. Defendants appeal. We affirm.

The issues for our consideration are:

1. Did the District Court err in ruling that the plaintiffs proved by a preponderance of the evidence that their southern boundary actually lies on a survey line which describes defendants’ northern boundary?

2. Did the District Court err in failing to find that a valid parol agreement was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sperry v. Montana State UniversityMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Pilgrim v. KuipersMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mellem v. Kalispell Laundry & Dry CleanersMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Christie v. PapkeMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Perusich v. MeierMontana Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Goodover v. Lindey's Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Christian v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Cole v. State Ex Rel. BrownMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Larson v. UndemMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Y a Bar Livestock Co. v. HarknessMontana Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API