Legal Opinion
Art v. Erwin
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 25, 2009No. 08AP-835PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sadler, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Butler Wick & Co., Inc. (“Butler”), appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division (“probate court”), in a statutory concealment action against Butler, in which the probate court denied Butler’s motion to stay the concealment proceedings pending arbitration.
{¶ 2} We begin by reviewing the salient facts and procedural history in this case. On November 5,1993, Katherine A. Guzay established a brokerage account with Butler. In connection with the establishment of this account, Guzay and Butler entered into a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Council of Smaller Enterprises v. Gates, McDonald & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Williams v. Aetna Fin. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- Academy of Medicine v. Aetna Health, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Estate of Beatley v. FisherOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State v. HarmonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Art v. ErwinOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Stieg v. Hanson (In re Stieg)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014