Legal Opinion

Herzog v. Herzog

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1952No. 3679PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

Paul Herzog obtained a divorce from Florence G. Herzog on the ground of the latter’s insanity. The court rejected appellant’s cross complaint for desertion. Appellant, through her guardian ad litem, assigns 20 separate errors in support of her appeal. Many of these are repetitious and many obviously without merit.

1. The record contains so much competent testimony of some seven doctors and psychiatrists as to the insanity of the defendant over a period of years that we should not be justified in spending any time in discussing appellant’s contention that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lake v. BenderNevada Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Sweeney v. SweeneyNevada Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Buaas v. BuaasNevada Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Walker v. WalkerNevada Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Klinker v. KlinkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Stojanovich v. StojanovichNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Sly v. SlyNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  4. McNabney v. McNabneyNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Kentucky Dept. of Mental Health v. MullinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API