Legal Opinion

McNabney v. McNabney

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1989No. 17755PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*654OPINION

By the Court,

Springer, J.:

The outcome of this appeal rests on the meaning of the words “just and equitable” as used in NRS 125.150(1). This statute relates to court distribution of community property between spouses in divorce cases.

In granting a divorce, the court . . . shall make such disposition of. . . the community property of the parties . . . as appears just and equitable, having regard to the respective merits of the parties and to the condition in which they will be left by the divorce, and to the party through whom the property was acquired, and the burdens, if any, imposed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Fletcher v. FletcherNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Johnson v. Steel, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Stojanovich v. StojanovichNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Schreiber v. SchreiberNevada Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sprenger v. SprengerNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Shydler v. ShydlerNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Malmquist v. MalmquistNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Anderson v. AndersonNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In Re FieldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API