Diffie v. Cowan
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Appellant insists it was error to sustain the motion to dissolve, because he says (1) appellees at the time had not filed an answer to the petition for the writ; (2) the Legislature could not confer on the mayor and aldermen power it undertook to confer on them to suspend, try, convict, and remove elective officers of the city; (3) if the Legislature had such power it did not intend to confer it so far as aldermen were concerned; and (4) if the Legislature could and did confer such power, it did not appear in the charges preferred against appellant that he had done any of the things specified…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Callaghan v. TobinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Riggins v. RichardsTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- Bonner v. BelsterlingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Riggins v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Miles v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MustoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- State Ex Rel. La Crosse v. AverillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Garza v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
- State Ex Rel. Doherty v. FinneganConnecticut Superior Court · 1964
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.