Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. La Crosse v. Averill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 13, 1937No. 10229PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITFI, Chief Justice.

This action, in the nature of a quo war-ranto, was brought by the state,- upon the relation of its district attorney, to remove respondents, H. Averill and Otto Koog, from the office of city commissioner of the city of Del Rio, into which office they had been regularly inducted after due election thereto. The two respondents, in conjunction with the mayor, constitute the entire city commission.

Del Rio is a home-rule city, so called, and was organized and is now operating as such under the provisions of chapter 13, title 28, Revised Statutes of 1925, as amended (Vernon’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Miller v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Diffie v. CowanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. MODDY v. City of University ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. Newsom v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  3. White v. Eastland CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. City of Del Rio v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Nider v. HomanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API