Legal Opinion

Donigi v. American Cyanamid Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1978PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs to respondent. Although the order of the Appellate Division is appealable, it is not reviewable. Appellant raises only a question of fact as to the weight of the evidence. Since no question of law is presented, the order of the Appellate Division lies beyond our power of review. (Pfohl v Wipperman, 34 NY2d 597; Armstrong v Campbell, 30 NY2d 704; Indiere v *937Strickroth, 28 NY2d 513; see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev ed], § 148, p 588.)

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pfohl v. WippermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Wolfgruber v. Upjohn Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Cooley v. Carter-Wallace Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Ezagui v. Dow Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  5. Noia v. De RosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API