Legal Opinion
F.V. v. Barron
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided March 5, 2018No. Case No. 1:17–CV–00170–CWDPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
(DKT. 28)
Candy W. Dale, U.S. Magistrate Judge
INTRODUCTION
Transgender individuals born in Idaho cannot obtain a birth certificate with the *1134listed sex matching their gender identity. The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (IDHW) interprets state law to bar changes to the listed sex unless an applicant can show there was an error of identification at birth. Therefore, as a policy, IDHW categorically and automatically denies applications to change the listed sex for any other reason. The questions presented to the Court are whether IDHW's interpretation, as applied, violates the Equal…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. SkrmettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
- Fowler v. StittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- Flack v. Wis. Dept. of Health Servs.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2018
- In re Gray and RiceUtah Supreme Court · 2021
- (PC) Crowder v. FoxDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.