Dolan v. O'Toole
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Defendant was the owner of a certain mine, and had contracted with a third party for the sale of it upon certain terms—in substance, that the purchaser should be put in possession for a specified time for the purpose of examination and development, and, if found satisfactory, to pay therefor a specified price. Plaintiff was an experienced miner and expert, and was well acquainted with the location of the mine and the work done in it, and while the conditional purchasers were in possession under their contract and prospecting for ore, defendant made a contract with the plaintiff for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Shanklin v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by14 opinions
- Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hicks v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Keith v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Sorenson v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Hooper v. MayfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.