Shanklin v. Hall
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This is an action to recover for services rendered in the exchange of certain real estate. Judgment went for plaintiff, a motion for a new trial was made and granted, and this appeal is prosecuted from the order granting a new trial. The case was tried by the court, and the new trial w*as granted upon the ground that “ the decision was against law.” The court made the following findings of fact: “ That on the seventeenth day of April, 1890, the plaintiff and defendant entered into an oral agreement, whereby it was agreed between them that plaintiff should use his knowledge and influence on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Zeimer v. AntisellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- McCarthy v. LoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Myres v. SurryhneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Gray v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Hicks v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Rochester v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.