Calhoun v. West End Brewing Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSearl, J.
Motion to strike out a defense contained in the answer, as insufficient in law (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 109, subd. 6).
The defense in question alleges that Royal Indemnity Company was the compensation insurance carrier covering Airway *424Painting and Decorating Company, the employer of plaintiff, that the expenses for medical treatment referred to in the complaint were paid by Royal Indemnity Company and, because of the provisions of section 13 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, the cause of action to recover the amounts so paid for medical treatment belongs to Royal Indemnity Company.
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Woolen Co. v. . SamuelsohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- O'Brien v. LodiNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Hession v. Sari CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Lumber Mutual Casualty Insurance v. FriedmanNew York Supreme Court · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wenger v. Pullman Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1948