Legal Opinion

Boardman v. Astrue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 21, 2008No. 06-35500PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ****

Kevin Boardman appeals the district court’s order affirming the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security that Boardman is not entitled to Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits. The parties are familiar with the facts, which we repeat here only to the extent necessary. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the Commissioner’s denial of benefits de novo, see Gillett-Netting v. Barnhart, 371 F.3d 593, 595 (9th Cir.2004), and reverse.

We will affirm the Commissioner’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence. Batson v. Comm’r of Soc.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. James L. Batson, Sr. v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Silva Tonapetyan v. William A. Halter, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Acting Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.District Court, D. Arizona · 2017
  2. (SS) Alexander v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. (SS) Howell v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. (SS) Lozano v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. Lizeth Ontiveros v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API