Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Acting Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided December 29, 2017No. CV–17–00195–PHX–GMSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Eileen S. Willett, United States Magistrate Judge
Pending before the Court is Diane Carol Roberts' ("Plaintiff") appeal of the Social Security Administration's ("Social Security") denial of her application for supplemental security income. The Court has jurisdiction to decide Plaintiff's appeal pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c). Under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Court has the power to enter, based upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the case for a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ford v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Meixner v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022