Group One Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., Defendant-Cross
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Group One Ltd. (“Group One”) appeals from the judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Missouri finding, inter alia, its U.S. Patent Nos. 5,518,-492 (the “ ’492 patent”) and 5,711,752 (the “ ’752 patent”) invalid. Group One, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., No. 97-CV-1224 (W.D.Mo. Feb. 20, 2004). Hallmark Cards, Inc. (“Hallmark”) cross appeals on various issues. We reverse the district court’s grant of judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) for obviousness, and reinstate the jury verdict that the patents were not invalid for obviousness. However, we affirm the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Medical Instrumentation and Diagnostics Corporation v. Elekta Ab, Elekta Instrument Ab, Elekta Instruments, Inc., and Elekta Oncology Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Modine Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. The Allen Group, Inc., D/B/A the G & O Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Group One, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- In Re Chippendales Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Research Corp. Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- H-W Technology, L.C. v. overstock.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.