Legal Opinion
Canadyne-Georgia Corp. v. Cleveland
District Court, M.D. Georgia
Decided September 30, 1999No. 5:96-CV-114-1 DFPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FITZPATRICK, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Canadyne-Georgia Corporation (Canadyne), filed this suit under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 et seq., claiming that the Defendants should be required to contribute funds for cleanup costs incurred by Canadyne as a result of a mandate issued by the Equal Protection Agency (EPA). Defendants, Woolfolk Chemical Works Limited (WCW), and the J.W. Woolfolk Trust (the Woolfolk Trust) have now moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the FRCP. For the reasons discussed below,…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Canadyne-Georgia Corp. v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2001
- Wells Fargo Vendor Fin. Servs., LLC v. Nationwide Learning, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
- Canadyne-Georgia, Corp. v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2001
- LM Insurance Corporation v. Smart Framing Construction LLC, Angel Gutierrez CastilloDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026