Legal Opinion

357 East Seventy-Sixth Street Corp. v. Knickerbocker Ice Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1933PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrouch, J.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff and defendant were the respective owners of adjacent premises, acquiring title through mesne conveyances from a common grantor who erected tenement buildings on both lots, with a party wall equally upon each. The plaintiff subsequently demolished the building on its premises, except the party wall, intending to erect a garage, which should use the party wall for support on that side. Before this was done, defendant, in order to erect an ice plant on its own premises, demolished its building and the entire party wall. Thereby, it is said, plaintiff was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Forstmann v. Joray Holding Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Partridge v. . Gilbert and OthersNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Brooks v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Ogden v. . JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Heyman v. . BiggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. Fulton Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Larue v. Greene County BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Udell v. City Title InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  4. 5 East 73rd, Inc. v. 11 East 73rd Street Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Morrow v. GerberNew York Supreme Court · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API