Legal Opinion

Rush v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2002No. 20010282PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Cheryll Rush appealed from a district court judgment affirming a Workers Compensation Bureau order which denied benefits for Rush’s cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure. We affirm, concluding the Bureau did not err in determining Rush’s heart condition was not causally related to her prior work injury.

I

[¶ 2] On January 7, 1999, Rush was injured while working at the Knife River Care Center in Beulah. A leak occurred in the hot water heating system at the care center and, because employees originally believed the escaping vapor was smoke from a fire, Rush…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Howes v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Inglis v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Negaard-Cooley v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Wanstrom v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Wherry v. North Dakota State HospitalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Elshaug v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Bachmeier v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Davenport v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Vogel v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Across Big Sky Flow Testing, LLC v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API