Legal Opinion
Bell v. Novick Transfer Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 23, 1955No. 8014PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, District Judge.
In this tort action, originally filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City, and removed to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1441 and 1446, defendants have moved to “dismiss the Declaration” because (1) it “fails to state a claim against the defendants and each of them upon which relief can be granted” ; (2) it “alleges only that an accident occurred due to the negligence of the defendants as a result of which the plaintiffs were injured”; and (3) it “fails to allege the specific acts of negligence by the defendants of which the plaintiffs complain”.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sierocinski v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Swift & Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- United States v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Jeter v. Schwind Quarry Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- Livingston v. Stewart & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Forline v. Helpers Local No. 42District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Buining v. the TransporterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
- Thomas v. Penn Supply & Metal Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964