Legal Opinion

State v. Bartlett

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1975No. 39989PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClinton, J.

The defendant, Bartlett, was found guilty by a jury of knowingly or intentionally possessing heroin with intent to deliver. After the verdict, he was found guilty by the court on a second count of being a habitual criminal and was sentenced to a term of 20 to 30 years in the Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex. On appeal he assigns as error the following: (1) He did not receive a fair trial because the prosecution intentionally and deliberately attempted to establish an association of the defendant with persons known or reputed to be dealers in controlled substances. (2) The court erred…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Zap v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. McGuire v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. State v. FairclothNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. FranklinNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. ParteeNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. BartlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. JourneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. BrennenNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API