Legal Opinion
State v. Faircloth
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1967No. 36385PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.
The defendants, Dwight Edwin Faircloth, James Allen Oram, and Larry Dale Martin, were charged with unlawful possession and control of narcotics in violation of section 28-452, R. R. S. 1943. At the close of the State’s evidence the defendants’ motion to dismiss, for want of sufficient evidence was sustained by the trial court.
Application was. then made to this court by the State, pursuant to section 29-2315.01, R. R. S. 1943, and .leave to docket error proceedings was obtained. The State seeks a review of the judgment of the trial court dismissing the prosecution for lack of sufficient…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The People v. MacKIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Spataro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- William Evans and Josephine Evans v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Carroll v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Reyes v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. ReevesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
- State v. DraganescuNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. DavenportMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.