Legal Opinion

United States v. Kelsey

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 30, 1982No. CM 441227PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HANFT, Judge:

Kelsey was convicted of two specifications of assault with a dangerous weapon and one specification of assault and battery, all occurring at Wuerzberg, Germany, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 928 (1976). Between the date of the offenses and the date of trial, the victim of one of the aggravated assaults, Specialist Four Mahoney, completed his service commitment. He was discharged from the Army, returned to his home in Massachusetts, and declined to accept invitational travel orders to return to Germany for Kelsey’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. GrayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. DempseyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. CrockettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. SealU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. DarbyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  4. United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API