Legal Opinion

United States v. Darby

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided December 1, 1988No. ACM 27065PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

BLOMMERS, Judge:

In accordance with his pleas, the appellant stands convicted of violating a general regulation, larceny, and unauthorized sale *763of military property. Electing trial by members, he was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, three years confinement, total forfeitures, and reduction to airman basic (E-l). He asserts three errors, one of which warrants discussion.

In his Recommendations to the convening authority (R.C.M. 1106), the Staff Judge Advocate advised that total forfeitures could be adjudged only for the period of time the appellant is imprisoned, citing United…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. WarnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. QuesinberryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  3. United States v. MurphyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. StrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  5. United States v. McIntoshUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. BowenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  2. United States v. BoydUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  3. United States v. MaharajhU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. CarverU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API