Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Holverson v. Evans

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1923Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

WM. E. LEE, J.,

Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part. — I concur with the majority in reversing the judgment, but for reasons other than those set forth in the majority opinion. This case was originally assigned to me for the purpose of writing the opinion of the court. The opinion prepared by myself was agreed to as the opinion of the court, sitting in division, although Mr. Justice Dunn concurred merely in the conclusion reached. Petitions for rehearing were filed, and because of the importance of the question involved, a rehearing ■ was unanimously agreed to. *438Having devoted some time…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. House v. PierecyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hurley v. AnickerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Wall v. Estate of McEnneryWashington Supreme Court · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API