Legal Opinion

Application of Christopher L. Wilson and Robert Lieberman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 12, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6858PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the affirmance by the Patent Office Board of Appeals of the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11 and 12 of appellants’ patent application Ser. No. 451,703, filed August 23, 1954, for “Process of Making Foamed Polyester Materials.”

The invention is a method of making what are now known as polyurethane foam products. Appellants’ specification acknowledges that such products and processes of making them were known prior to their invention and that the foam product results from reacting a polyester resin, an organic diisocyanate, and water. A…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Application of William C. Rainer, Edward M. Redding, Joseph J. Hitov, Arthur W. Sloan and William D. StewartCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. Application of John P. Swentzel (The Carborundum Co., Assignee)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re HoganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. Application of Sune Bergstrom and Jan SjovallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. In re KollerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
  4. In re LangerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  5. In re deC. KratzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API