Legal Opinion

Blythe v. Lamberth

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1919No. Civ. No. 2336PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from the judgment. The sole contention made is that the holder of a trust deed given to secure a lien upon real property, after exhausting the remedy by sale and finding that a deficiency exists, may not proceed by action to recover the balance due upon the promissory note. This point was directly decided, long before this appeal was taken, against the contention here urged. (Sacramento Bank v. Copsey, 133 Cal. 663, [85 Am. St. Rep. 242, 66 P. 8, 205]; Kraft Co. v. Bryan,140 Cal. 73, [73 P. 745].)

The appeal is without the slightest merit and should not have been taken.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Herbert Kraft Co. v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Sacramento Bank v. CopseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hatch v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API