Legal Opinion

Sacramento Bank v. Copsey

California Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1901No. Sac. No. 835PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Defendants executed a trust deed for the purpose of securing the payment of a promissory note in favor of plaintiff. The trustees, after breach in the condition of the deed, sold the land, and credited the amount received from the sale upon the note, less the costs of the sale. Plaintiff then brought the present action to recover the balance due upon the note. Judgment went against it, and this appeal is prosecuted therefrom.

As indicated by an opinion found in appellant’s brief, the trial court seemed to hold that plaintiff must look alone to the land described in the trust deed for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowler v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  2. Mallory v. KesslerUtah Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hatch v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Crowley v. RorvigMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Rosenberg v. JanssenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Blythe v. LamberthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Blythe v. LamberthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API