Legal Opinion
Charles E. Moore v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 1, 1969No. 13222_1PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge.
Social Security benefits were denied Charles E. Moore by the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare on the finding that he had not become disabled, within the meaning of the Act, §§ 216(i) and 223, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) and 423, before his insurance coverage expired on September 30, 1960. On review, the Federal Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, clearly charting the apt legal principles, affirmed, believing the finding was supported by substantial evidence. Social Security Act § 205(g), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Moore v. Finch (S.D.W.Va. 1968).…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- William P. Flake v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Troy Whitt v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
3Cited by40 opinions
- Bird v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Hazel Cutler v. Caspar Weinberger, as Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Hubert Brand v. Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Ann E. Waters v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Lackey v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.