Legal Opinion

Anderson Carriage Co. v. Pungs

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1903No. Docket No. 23PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Assumpsit by the Anderson Carriage Company against William A. Pungs for the breach of a contract to convey certain patents. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is a suit in assumpsit, brought by the Anderson Carriage Company, a Michigan corporation, against William A. Pungs. The plaintiff recovered a verdict for $17,970.24. The defendant has brought the case here by writ of error.

Prior to February 12, 1897, the Anderson Manufacturing Company was a corporation located in the city of Detroit. The Michigan Railway Supply Company was also a corporation located in the city of Detroit. On February 12, 1897, the two companies were consolidated, and all of their property and assets were conveyed to a new company, known as the Pungs-Anderson…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Anderson Carriage Co. v. PungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Anderson Carriage Co. v. PungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alderton v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Anderson Carriage Co. v. PungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Anderson Carriage Co. v. PungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Major v. BrewsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API