Legal Opinion

Anderson Carriage Co. v. Pungs

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1905No. Docket No. 73PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit by the Anderson Carriage Company against William A. Pungs for the breach of a contract to convey certain patents. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

This is the second time this case has "been before this court. Our former opinion will be found in 134 Mich. 474. On that occasion we reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff. A second trial has been had, resulting in a judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiff asks us to reverse that judgment. As the facts are fully- stated in our former opinion, we content ourselves with making a brief statement: February 12, 1897, two corporations, viz., the Anderson Manufacturing Company and the Michigan Railway Supply Company, consolidated and formed a new corporation, known as the Pungs-Anderson…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. JennesMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Anderson Carriage Co. v. PungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson Carriage Co. v. PungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API