Legal Opinion

Clowers v. Stickel

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 16, 2012No. CA 11-1306PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge.

| Appellant, Tom Clowers, challenges both the trial court’s finding that his motion to modify his divorce decree is barred by res judicata and collateral estoppel and its award of travel expenses and attorney’s fees to his ex-wife, appellee Linda Stickel.1 We affirm the trial court’s decision that Tom’s motion to modify is barred by res judicata; reverse and remand the award of attorney’s fees to Linda in order for the trial court to consider the Chrisco factors; and reverse the award of travel expenses.

The Original Action

The parties were married in August 1967 and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Sunbelt Exploration Co. v. Stephens Production Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Lindsey v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Hunt v. PerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tiner v. TinerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API