Legal Opinion

Holloway v. Brechtse

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 18, 2003No. CIV.A. 03-2141PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOYNER, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant, Andrew Lam Brechtse. Plaintiffs, Jacqueline Holloway and James Holloway, 1 bring a federal claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law claims of assault, battery, false arrest and illegal imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and loss of consortium. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.

BACKGROUND

The facts, taken from Plaintiffs complaint and in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, are as follows: on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Kulwicki v. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. Kim Brown v. Muhlenberg TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Udujih v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. STURGIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. THORPE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API