Legal Opinion

Dark v. . Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1945Published

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

It may be conceded that plaintiff has failed to show, with exactness, for what purpose Or in what capacity her intestate was on the defendant’s truck at the time of his injury. This, however, need not defeat her action, even though the complaint contains specific allegations in respect of the matter. Williams v. McLean, 221 N. C., 228, 19 S. E. (2d), 867. The gravamen of the cause of action is the alleged breach of duty which the defendant owed plaintiff’s intestate in the circumstances disclosed by the record. Russell v. Cutshall, 223 N. C., 353, 26 S. E. (2d), 866; White v. McCabe, 208 N.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Henderson Ex Rel. Utley v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Pleasants v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. White v. . McCabeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Russell Ex Rel. Russell v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Michaux v. R. G. Lassiter & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API