Sanders v. Tailored Chemical Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM—ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
In moving for class certification the burden rests upon plaintiffs to overcome the numerous decisions which hold that certification is rarely appropriate in mass tort actions, “especially” those involving misconduct by one or more defendants over an extended period of time. See, e.g., Abed v. A.H. Robins Co., 693 F.2d 847, 852 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 817, 74 L.Ed.2d 1015 (1983). We do not, however, base our conclusion upon any numerical preponderance among the decided cases which appears to favor defendant. Rather, our…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robert La Mar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, Ronald J. Kinsling v. Allegheny AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Harrigan v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Abed v. A. H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Asbestos School LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- In re Tetracycline CasesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- Fletcher v. Cape Cod Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Caruso v. Celsius Insulation Resources, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Pearl v. Allied Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.