Legal Opinion
Caruso v. Celsius Insulation Resources, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 17, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 83-1149PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Before the court is plaintiff Patsy Caruso’s motion for class certification pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. For the reasons given in the following discussion, the motion is denied.
II. Background
The facts, as alleged and presented by the parties, evince the following scenario. Defendant Celsius Insulation Resources, Inc., (“Celsius”), manufactured urea formaldehyde foam insulation (“UFFI”), a product ultimately purchased by plaintiff. UFFI was also purchased, used by, or in some way affected members of the class plaintiff seeks…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 451, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,741 John Senter, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- In re Tetracycline CasesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- Fletcher v. Cape Cod Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Harding v. Tambrands Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.