Legal Opinion
Pearl v. Allied Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 28, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 82-2931PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiffs allege that they have suffered injury as a result of the installation of urea formaldehyde foam insulation (UFFI) in their residence. Their second amended complaint seeks recovery under the theories of strict liability, negligence, express warranty and implied warranty. It also includes class action allegations which support our maintaining this action as such. Specifically, the plaintiffs allege that they are adequate representatives of two separate classes of individuals with whom they are similarly situated. Both classes…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Feinstein v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Delaney v. Borden, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Sanders v. Tailored Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- Microsoft Corp. v. Manning, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
- Arch v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- In re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Gonzalez v. CorningDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Woodward v. SalazarDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.