Legal Opinion
Ringor v. State
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided December 3, 1998No. 20588PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATANABE, Judge.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the parole of Petitioner-Appellant Casey Ringor (Petitioner) was improperly revoked by the Hawaii Paroling Authority (the HPA) without a hearing, following his conviction and sentence to imprisonment for a federal felony offense committed in the State of Hawaii (the State) while he was on parole. The Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit (the circuit court) answered the foregoing question in the negative and, accordingly, denied Petitioner’s Hawaii Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP) Rule 40 petition for an order releasing him…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Richardson v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Metcalf v. VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES'BEN. ASS'NHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. MwangiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. KongHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2013
- Williams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Jardine v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.