Legal Opinion
Lewis-Williams v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 21, 2024No. 3:22-cv-06119Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 GABRIEL CHAVEZ, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, No. C 22-06119 WHA 12 v. 13 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA RAPID ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TRANSIT DISTRICT, IN LIMINE NO. 7 14 Defendant. 15 16 INTRODUCTION 17 In this Title VII and FEHA failure-to-accommodate action plaintiffs, former employees 18 of defendant transit district, challenge the admissibility of defendant’s expert industrial 19 hygienist. For the reasons stated below, the motion to exclude is DENIED. 20 21 STATEMENT 22 The facts underlying this action have been…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Charlotte KENNEDY and Robert Kennedy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COLLAGEN CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Jerrold S. HELLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EBB AUTO CO., Dba Ron Tonkin Mitsubishi, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.