Legal Opinion
Lot 39, Section C, Northern Hills Subdivision, Grayson County v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
Decided August 22, 2002No. 11-01-00244-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JIM R. WRIGHT, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether a homestead is protected from forfeiture in a proceeding brought by the State pursuant to TEX. CODE CRIM. PRO. ANN. art. 59.01 et seq. (Vernon Pamph. Supp. 2002)(hereinafter referred to as Chapter 59). The State sought the forfeiture of Lot 39, Section C, Northern Hills Subdivision, Grayson County, Texas. This property was Daniel Helm’s homestead, and Helm asserted that it was exempt from forfeiture pursuant to TEX. CONST. art. XVI, § 50 and TEX. PROP. CODE ANN. § 41.001 (Vernon Supp. 2002). The trial court rejected Helm’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Woods v. Alvarado State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1929
- Butterworth v. CaggianoSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Andrews Et Ux. v. SEC. Bank of W. F.Texas Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. Lot 10, Pine Haven Estates, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
- Bochas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Torgelson v. . Real Property Known as 17138 880th Ave., Renville CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Torgelson v. Real Property Known as 17138 880th AveCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Lot 6, Nw 17' of 5, Block 5, Port Lavaca Original Townsite (401 S. Commerce) v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
- Lot 6, Nw 17' of 5, Block 5, Port Lavaca Original Townsite (401 S. Commerce) v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
- Torgelson v. . Real Property Known as 17138 880th Ave., Renville CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008