Legal Opinion

Board of Tenement House Supervision v. Schlechter

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 25, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On appeal from District Court, and on motion to dismiss, said appeal'. ■ •

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the' court was delivered by

Parker, J.

We take up first the motion to dismiss the appeal. This is urged on several grounds. The first ground is that no bond was entered into as required by the act of 1902, p. 565, as amended in 1910. Comp. Stat., p. 2016, pi, 213a. But it is plain that the appellant is a state agency., Comp. 8tat., p. 5354., § 203. Consequently the usual rule as to costs does not apply. See 3 Stew. Eq. 664, note. Section 2-12 of the Practice act (Comp. Slat., p. 4126) is no doubt applicable under section 68 of the District Court act. Comp. Stal., p. 1944. As…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Green v. HeritageSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howell v. Port of New York AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
  2. DeSantis v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. In re the Condemnation & Taking of Lands & Every Interest therein of LawBurlington County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1936
  4. Levine v. State Board of Registration & Examination in DentistrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API