Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. Of San Francisco v. McConnell
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RIVES, Circuit Judge.
The main thrust of this appeal is an attack upon the decision of this court on former appeal, 178 F.2d 76, in the construction and application of the exclusion clause of the policy against loss in case the insured “voluntarily parts with title to or possession of any automobile at risk hereunder, whether or not induced so to do by any fraudulent scheme, trick, device or false pretense or otherwise.” The appellant insists that the decision of this court is in line with only one case, 1 and is opposed to the decisions of the other state courts of last resort which have…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDowell Motor Co. v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Jacobson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Tripp v. United States Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Boyd v. Travelers Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Ins. Co. Of Newark, N. J. v. BursonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Sam Hootstein & Sons, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975