Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 21, 2011No. 08C22940; A140542PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.

Petitioner sought a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that prison officials, outside of his presence, were opening and reading mail sent to him by his attorney. According to petitioner, this action violated a variety of his state and federal constitutional rights. The court granted defendant’s motion to deny the petition, and petitioner appeals. We affirm.

A motion to deny a habeas corpus petition under ORS 34.680 for failure to state a claim occurs after the petition for the writ is submitted but before it is issued; it is analogous to a motion to dismiss under ORCP 21 A(8). See Dunn v. Hill,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Penrod v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barrett v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Taylor v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Woods v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. Thomas Creek Lumber v. Dept. of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Foust v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API