Barrett v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Petitioner sought a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that prison officials, outside of his presence, were opening and reading mail sent to him by his attorney. According to petitioner, this action violated a variety of his state and federal constitutional rights. The court granted defendant’s motion to deny the petition, and petitioner appeals. We affirm.
A motion to deny a habeas corpus petition under ORS 34.680 for failure to state a claim occurs after the petition for the writ is submitted but before it is issued; it is analogous to a motion to dismiss under ORCP 21 A(8). See Dunn v. Hill,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Penrod v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barrett v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Taylor v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Woods v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Thomas Creek Lumber v. Dept. of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Foust v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.