Marose v. Hennameyer

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

This appeal involves a negligence action filed by appellant, Shirlee Marose, against respondent, Beverly Hennameyer, for injuries allegedly suffered by Marose in an automobile accident in which both were involved. Hennameyer moved for summary judgment on the ground that Marose had failed to meet the tort thresholds necessary to initiate a negligence suit under the Minnesota No-Fault Act. The court granted Hennameyer’s motion and dismissed the case with prejudice. We affirm.

FACTS

Marose was injured in a three-car accident on August 27, 1980. The vehicle in which she was…