Legal Opinion

Soskel v. Texaco, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 24, 1982No. 80 CIV 1272 (LBS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAND, District Judge.

The parties seek approval of a settlement of a putative but uncertified class action which would provide neither notice nor benefit to the class but which would provide for the payment of a fee of $10,000 to plaintiffs’ counsel. The plaintiffs do not assert that the action lacks merit but claim that events subsequent to its commencement significantly diminish the economic incentives to pursue the claim. We are therefore called upon, pursuant to the mandate of F.R.Civ.P. 23(e) to determine, in the exercise of our discretion and “after a careful inquiry into the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Magana v. Platzer Shipyard, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1977
  2. Sheinberg v. Fluor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  3. Oscar Gruss & Son v. Geon Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. TullyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API