Legal Opinion

Weil & Associates v. Urban Renewal Agency

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1971No. 45,852PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harman, C.:

This is an action for damages for breach of contract. Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure of the petition to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (K. S. A. 60-212 [b] [6], as amended). The trial court found no contract existed between the parties.

The trial court had before it only plaintiff’s petition to which were attached numerous exhibits. The petition was detailed in nature, revealing the following: Plaintiff is an unincorporated joint venture consisting of Bernard Weil of New…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Leavenworth v. RankinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. GormanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Mitchell v. City of CoffeyvilleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  4. Robertson v. McCuneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  5. Topeka Savings Association v. BeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Murphy v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  2. Robertson v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  3. Waste Connections of Kansas, Inc. v. Ritchie Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Beck v. Kansas Adult AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Miller v. Sloan, Listrom, Eisenbarth, Sloan & GlassmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API