Legal Opinion

Freiberg v. Stuart

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 1, 2021No. 19-3593Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-3593 Freiberg v. Stuart, et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER 1 RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. 2 CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS 3 PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE 4 PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A 5 SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST 6 CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH 7 THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY 8 ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Falls Church Group, Ltd. v. Tyler, Cooper & Alcorn, LLPSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. Stuart v. StuartConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. Tompkins v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API