Legal Opinion
State v. DISTRICT COURT OF VT. UNIT NO. 1, RUTLAND CIR.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 2, 1971No. 141-70PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.
This is a petition for a writ of certiorari. It relates tó a so-called “reasonableness” hearing held in district court in connection with a charge of driving while intoxicated. The case is State of Vermont v. Ellis James Flanders, docket number 1886-70 Rcr, in the Rutland Circuit of the District Court. Such a hearing is called for by 23 V.S.A. § 1205. No right of appellate review is provided, which accounts for the resort to certiorari. State v. Muzzy, 124 Vt. 222, 225, 202 A.2d 267 (1964); Royalton College v. State Bd. of Education, 127 Vt. 436, 438, 251 A.2d 498 (1969).
The review thus given…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. MuzzySupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- Petition of Town of EssexSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- McGarry v. CostelloSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- Royalton College, Inc. v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. LussierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- State v. WelchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- Dean Kent v. Jared Katz, Individually and as a Police Officer for the Town of ColchesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Burroughs v. West Windsor Board of School DirectorsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Shaw v. VERMONT DIST. COURT, UNIT NO. 3Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.