Legal Opinion
McGarry v. Costello
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 2, 1969No. 122-69PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, C.J.
This is a petition for a writ of certiorari. The proceedings we are called upon to review resulted from the petitioner’s refusal to submit to the testing procedures provided in motor vehicle statutes, commonly referred to as the “implied consent law.” The question presented concerns 23 V.S.A. §§ 1188 and 1191.
§ 1188. Consent to blood test implied
Any person who operates or attempts to operate a motor vehicle upon a public highway in this state is deemed to have given his consent to submit to a chemical test of his blood or such other test as herein provided for the purpose of determining the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The West River Bridge Company v. DIXSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Prucha v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. BallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
- State v. MuzzySupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- State v. DellveneriSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. StrongSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- State v. LundSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- State v. MaraSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- State v. MastalerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
- State v. OrvisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.