In Re Baby Doe
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Chief Justice:
This is an appeal from an order of the family court which held appellant husband responsible for the support of a child born to his wife as a result of artificial insemination. We affirm.
Husband has four grown children from a prior marriage. He married his present wife in the early 1970s and they attempted for several years to have a child. While living overseas, husband sought medical advice and learned that he was no longer able to father children, apparently due to physical trauma. Upon the parties’ return to this country, the diagnosis was confirmed. The parties…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. SorensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- C. M. v. C. C.Cumberland County Family Court · 1977
- Byers v. ByersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- In Re Marriage of Lms v. SlsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- K. S. v. G. S.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- K.B. v. N.B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Miller-Jenkins v. Miller-JenkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- John A. v. BuzzancaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Laura WW. v. Peter WW.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Patton v. VanterpoolSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.