Legal Opinion

Feibelman v. Packard

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 18, 1882PublishedCited by 17 opinions

IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

Moses Feibelman and (George Yoelker, as .partners, sued the defendants in error to recover .damages for the seizure of their-partnership goods by Packard, marshal of the United States for the District of Louisiana. A judgment was rendered .against them. Their interests in the suit were joint, and the judgment affects them jointly and not separately.' Feibelman alone has brought this writ of error, and there has been no summons and severance, or other equivalent proceeding. It follows that the writ must he dismissed, on the authority of Williams v. Ban k of the United States, 11 Wheat. 414;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Simpson v. GreeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1874

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Hardee v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Estis v. TrabueSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Kidder v. Fidelity Ins., Trust & Safe-Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  5. Provident Life & Trust Co. of Philadelphia v. Camden & T. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API