Legal Opinion

Wolf Klein & Sons, Inc. v. Bronstein

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 15, 1940No. 3139PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

It is suggested, though without the record, that counsel for the plaintiff consented to the hearing of the set-off and waived all objections to the court’s jurisdiction in that respect. Irregular procedure in a court having jurisdiction of the subject-matter may be waived by a party. Kimball v. Fisk, 39 N. H. 110; Harris v. Parker, 66 N. H. 324. But waiver cannot confer jurisdiction of the subject-matter where it does not exist. Little v. Dickinson, 29 N. H. 56, 61; State v. Kennison, 55 N. H. 242; Mansfield v. Holton, 74 N. H. 417, 421. The question of the jurisdiction to pass upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arcadia Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Elliott Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  2. Mansfield v. HoltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
  3. Harris v. ParkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1890
  4. State v. KennisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1875

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cooperman v. MacNeilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. In re DoeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943
  4. Appeal of Net Realty Holding TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. Gettler-Ryan, Inc. v. KashulinesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API